- Curated Curiosity
- Posts
- Curated Curiosity: Chaos by design
Curated Curiosity: Chaos by design
All-In Ep 204: Trump's cabinet strategy, $92k Bitcoin, and the real story behind D.O.G.E...
TODAY'S INSIGHT
"Evolution occurs through extinction events. The systems that survive emerge stronger. Trump's mandate isn't to maintain - it's to be the extinction event."
FEATURED EPISODE
The All-In Podcast Ep. 204: Trump's market impact: Bitcoin, M&A, IPOs + transition picks; Polymarket CEO raided by FBI
1.5hrs → 4 mins
WHAT THEY SAID
Cabinet picks like RFK Jr. and Matt Gaetz aren't about qualifications; they're stress tests designed to challenge entire agencies
Bitcoin hit 92k and fintech stocks are surging as markets price in potential deregulation and policy shifts
Trump is building a coalition cabinet representing different Republican factions rather than choosing one ideology
The goal of D.O.G.E is to complete major government restructuring by America's 250th anniversary in 2026
WHY IT MATTERS
This isn't just another political transition; it's a fundamental restructuring attempt of the federal government. Understanding this framework helps businesses and investors position themselves for potential massive system-wide changes rather than getting caught up in individual headlines.
MY TAKES
Friedberg's "extinction event" analogy brilliantly reframes this entire situation. Instead of seeing these appointments as chaos, view them as controlled demolition—deliberately inserting system shocks to force adaptation or collapse. It's less about individual qualifications and more about stress-testing entire institutional structures.
The pharma advertising debate caught my attention for a deeper reason. While the surface argument is about public health, the core issue is about government overreach. Should a free market allow all voices, even potentially harmful ones? Or does public health trump commercial speech rights? Friedberg had a fascinating take on this that I broke down here:
Phenomenal point from @friedberg here on allowing big pharma to advertise on TV.
I don't think you can be a free speech absolutist while also creating laws telling platforms what they can and cannot show.
"You cannot show _____ on your platform"
That's a degree of censorship.
— Ben Averbook (@benaverbook)
1:06 AM • Nov 17, 2024
PS: Tomorrow’s summary is going to be one you won’t want to miss. Alright, alright, alright.
Thanks for reading today’s newsletter. If you know any podcast fans, be sure to share this newsletter with them. I am extremely grateful for your attention.
Reply to this email with what you think about the episode. I’ll reply.
Ben Averbook
Reply